Skip to main content

Why Democracy is not Protected Today

As society has become more partisan, questions surrounding voting patterns with party lines have become prominent. Democracy remains extremely important in today's political climate because it allows for a prospering government that represents the people's wants. It ensures that fundamental freedoms are given to the people and that human rights are protected. However, the democracy that we are promised is not always seen. After Americans around the nation were disappointed in the 2016 presidential victor, Donald Trump, voting patterns with political parties needed to be evaluated to indicate increases or decreases following his term. Since the Republican party won, it could be assumed that Republican voter turnout was high. However, that is not true. The electoral college disappointed millions of voters when voting against the popular vote for Donald Trump. Much of the Republican party denied fairness in the election. However, multiple repetitions of state counting established that Donald Trump lost the election. The denial that much of the United States went through due to stubbornly seen leaders made many question democracy. 


Because of this, many Republican leaders tried to implement new voting procedures, which included allowing Republican officials to overthrow and essentially rule and purge voter rolls and voting-related decision-making in democratically governed areas. This makes both parties now question the realness of democracy in our country. Republicans could not throw out ballots they deemed questionable to ensure that state voting favored their party. This was highly illegal when the former president tried to do it, but with new wanted laws, this could be seen as fair. Imagining that one is associated with the democratic party, hearing that though the election was just in 2020 that new rules would leave future elections skewed is highly discouraging. Not only would this cause voting numbers to drop in future elections but give more power to said party over time because they would continue to vote while others do not. An increase in negative partisanship is highly drawn from unfairness within the system, causing parties to divide in ideology and hate each other.


As said by Brennan Center, in 2021, 19 states enacted 33 laws to make voting harder in the United States. These laws included less language inclusivity through translation, smaller voting periods, and decreased locations, causing many low-income individuals to be significantly affected. The country is going backward as the people's wants cannot even be shown since a large majority cannot vote. These low-income families that are highly targeted are mainly people of color, indicating that the voting requirements taking place are highly unjust. As a woman of color, the targeting and underrepresentation of such groups are dreadful. For democracy to be accurate and feel as though this country allows us to express and see change within our wants should be a priority. However, the first step to that is to start trusting our government. Though things will not always go the way we hope, parties cannot undermine the government to such an extent that they are changing laws. With such open backlash and high partisanship, the country we see as a whole will split into many hateful fragments. It is that in specific that will make democracy decline. 


https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-october-2021


This post was created by Vice President Neharika Rao.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Good & Bad of Straight Ticket Voting

Voting – especially in our current political climate – can be stressful. Oftentimes, voters can feel overwhelmed standing at the voting booth making a decision candidate by candidate, for many, it is easier to straight party vote. While straight-party voting is only an option in seven states; Alabama, Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Nevada, it is often seen as the ‘easy way out’. By checking one box, you are able to cast your ballot for every candidate of your chosen political party. This does not typically allow for the consideration of third-party candidates and does not encourage voters to be familiar with or educated on each candidate or state question prior to heading to the polls. During his time as the United States' first President, George Washington was quick to warn citizens against party loyalty, now, nearly 27.2 million registered voters in America have the option to do just that, should they decide to go vote. There are a variety of views re...

Why You Should Care About Moore v. Harper

So you may be wondering, what is Moore v. Harper? This groundbreaking case has been going on for over a year now, and when its final verdict comes out this year, it will have major implications for voting rights for many Americans. In 2021, the Republican-led North Carolina state legislature passed a bill that gerrymanders districts to create a state supermajority for their 14 seats. The map gives the Republicans a 99.9% chance of retaining their majority. The state voters were very unhappy with this and decided to contest this map in state courts, as there was a Supreme Court precedent that stated that federal courts cannot hear partisan gerrymandering cases. They contended that this map violated the North Carolina state constitution’s free election clause. At the time, the North Carolina Supreme Court had a Democrat majority within their elected court. The North Carolina Supreme Court agreed with the voters and struck down the map stating that it was an “egregious and intentional par...

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The following is a legal disclaimer for the blog published by the George Washington University chapter of Democracy Matters: The views expressed in the posts on this blog are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Democracy Matters. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their posts, and Democracy Matters does not endorse or assume any responsibility for any opinions, statements, or other content expressed in these posts. The information provided on this blog is intended for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice or guidance. Readers should not act or rely solely on the information provided on this blog without seeking the advice of a professional. Furthermore, Democracy Matters does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided on this blog. While we make every effort to ensure that the information on this blog is up-to-date and accurate, we ...